๐ง๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐: the performance implications of using ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ช๐ก๐ฉ() compared to ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ช๐ก๐ฉ(). While ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ช๐ก๐ฉ() ensures that only one element matches the condition, it does so by scanning the entire collection to verify uniqueness, which can ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฌ, especially with ๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐๐ญ๐ฌ. In contrast, ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ช๐ก๐ฉ() stops searching once it finds the first matching element, often resulting in ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ฑ๐๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. Therefore, the recommendation to prefer ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ช๐ก๐ฉ() over ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ช๐ก๐ฉ() without considering the performance trade-offs is incomplete and could ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฌ into writing less efficient code.